A student who was banned from Glasgow University’s campus has been told she can return to classes.
University bosses have reversed their decision to exclude Hannah Taylor from the campus after she took part in a pro-Palestine protest which saw a University of Glasgow building daubed with water-soluble paint.
Ms Taylor faced disciplinary action under the University’s code of conduct, but has now agreed to refrain from taking part in similar actions, or encourage others to do so, in exchange for the ban being lifted.
She has also agreed to pay half of the £2844 clean-up bill.
Acting with another student, Ms Taylor - a member of group called Youth Demand - used a fire extinguisher to spray the James McCune Smith Learning Hub in red paint.
The pair then glued themselves onto the front of the building during the protest in February.
The students daubed the building in paint during the protest (Image: Youth Demand) The group’s protest calls for the University of Glasgow to divest from the arms trade.
According to the Glasgow University Arms Divestment Coalition, the university has more than £6.8m worth of investments in the arms industry, and has also received around £600,000 in research funding from BAE Systems and Rolls Royce since 2017.
Both protestors were arrested but have yet to be convicted of any crime, with a court hearing still months away.
However, the University acted almost immediately to ban her from the campus, potentially wrecking her chances of completing her studies for a Masters degree in Maths.
After the ban was imposed, University of Glasgow Rector Dr. Ghassan Abu-Sittah to accuse the University of a “disproportionate and authoritarian” response to student protest.
Calling for the ban to be reversed, he said: "This ... is in keeping with a concerted effort to crack down on student activism for Palestine on campuses around the globe.
"From Glasgow to New York, University leaders have bowed to government pressure, seeking to make examples of those students who dare to expose their complicity in genocide.
"Glasgow University’s motto is ‘Via, Veritas, Vita’ (the way, the truth, the life). Now this liberal facade has fallen. Today, Glasgow’s students are punished, threatened and intimidated for exposing the truth of their institution’s role in facilitating imperialism’s crimes.
"But the students will not be deterred. Not in Glasgow. Not anywhere. Glasgow University must immediately lift the ban on Hannah Taylor.”
Students occupy the Charles Wilson building (Image: Gordon Terris/The Herald) The University of Glasgow has seen a growing number of protests linked to the war in Gaza and calls for it to divest funds.
Last week, students occupied a campus building for several hours.
Hundreds had gathered outside the Charles Wilson Building which some students had taken over and were refusing to leave.
Some of those involved had started a hunger strike to demand the school divest from the arms trade and lift the campus ban imposed on Ms Taylor.
READ MORE:
- Glasgow University student banned from campus over pro-Palestine demo
- Glasgow University rector speaks out on Hannah Taylor ban
- Glasgow students block University Avenue as part of Israel protests
A day later around 100 students blocked off University Avenue, the main thoroughfare through the campus.
Speaking after the ban was lifted on Tuesday, Ms Taylor said she would abide by the new conditions.
She said: “The university has decided to remove my campus ban following a wave of public objections including from the rector himself. They are beginning to see that they cannot ignore us any longer.
“We have to keep advocating for divestment until they comply with our demands. No campus ban should deter a student from demanding justice for Palestine”
A University spokesperson said: "We do not comment on individual students."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel
You must verify your phone number before you can comment.
Please enter your phone number below, and a verification code will be sent to you by text message.
Please enter the six-digit verification code sent to you by SMS.
Your verification code has been sent a second time to the mobile phone number you provided.
Your verification code has been sent a third time to the mobile phone number you provided.
You have requested your verification code too many times. Please try again later.
Didn’t receive a code? Send it againThe code you entered has not been recognised.
Please try again
You have failed to enter a correct code after three attempts.
Please try again later.
Your phone number has been verified.
Your phone number has been stored with your account details. We will never use it for anything other than verifying that you are the legitimate owner of this account.